How to tell whether an IP workshop helped
Judge the session by what became clearer for participants, not by attendance or applause, and use what you learn to change the next one.
By IPRights4All
An original, practical way to evaluate a community IP workshop in any country; it is not a validated research instrument.
People enjoyed the session, the room stayed busy, and several asked for the slides. Those are good signs, but they tell you people were engaged, not what they learned. To find that out, ask three things: what became clearer, what is still confusing, and whether the material connects to something they want to do.
Return to the promise you made
Measure the session against the one question it set out to answer. If it promised to help people think about using photographs they find online, check for exactly that. Do participants now know to check where an image came from and whether they have permission for the use they have in mind? Can they say where they would look? Do not judge a workshop about one practical question by whether everyone can explain the whole IP system.
Pick your test example before the session, so you know what understanding looks like when you hear it. For example: a newsletter editor has found a useful photograph online and wants to print it in the next issue.
Invite participants to explain in their own words
Near the end, return to the example and ask: “What would you want to find out before using this photograph?” Let people answer aloud, on paper, or anonymously. Listen for one distinction: being able to see an image is not the same as having a basis to reproduce it. If most answers miss that distinction, rework the explanation or the example before you run the session again.
Do not rank answers in public. People take part thoughtfully in different ways, and confidence often drops when someone first meets the complexity. A participant who says, “I now know which part I am unsure about,” has learned something useful. Count that as a result.
Ask about the experience as well as the idea
Ask separately about pace, language, format and examples. Two questions do most of the work: Which part was useful? Which part felt far from your own work? Do not rely on a single satisfaction score: it hides specific problems, such as a handout that was hard to read or a legal term that never became clear.
Make it easy to decline or to criticize. Say that feedback is optional, offer an anonymous route, and say how you will use the answers. Do not ask for anyone’s contracts, dispute details or application history to show that the workshop produced activity.
Follow up only where it adds something useful
Ask permission before you contact anyone afterwards. A short follow-up message can ask three things: Did you use one of the readings? Did you find the right contact? What still needs a clearer explanation? Record what people tell you as their account, separate from what you observed yourself. If someone says the workshop helped them avoid a mistake, write down what they said; do not put a money value on it.
Then write a three-line facilitator note:
- The example that worked.
- The misunderstanding that remained.
- One change for next time: replace an unfamiliar scenario, slow down a section, or add a local source.
Make that change before the next group arrives. That improvement, for the next group and for anyone who keeps learning, is what the evaluation is for.
Recommended next reading
Tangentially related reading
Explore the full Learn map for every article and reading sequence. Members can ask Tilly about this article; Tilly cites the articles it uses. Or copy the Learn prompt into your own AI assistant.
Citation: “How to tell whether an IP workshop helped”, IPRights4All. https://iprights4all.com/learn/evaluating-an-ip-workshop